Search
Close this search box.
By: Asal Taheri

The missile and drone capabilities of Iran and Israel have long been central to their security strategies and regional influence. By mid-2025, both nations had spent decades developing sophisticated arsenals, each tailored to their unique geographic, political, and military realities. The short but intense conflict of June 2025 offered a rare, real-time glimpse into how these systems perform under sustained pressure — and how quickly stockpiles, budgets, and technology can be tested. This comparison examines the state of each country’s missile and drone programs before the war, what changed during the fighting, and where they may go next.

Iran: From Quantity to Questions of Sustainability

Khorramshahr-4
Before June 2025, Iran’s missile arsenal was one of the largest in the region, estimated at over 3,000 ballistic missiles, with roughly 1,000 operational. These ranged from short-range systems like the Fateh-110 (200–300 km) to medium-range missiles such as the Shahab-3 (~1,300 km) and Khorramshahr variants (~2,000 km). Officially, Iran maintained a self-imposed 2,000 km limit, but rumors persisted of the Khorramshahr-5 — an unverified system that, if operational, would mark Iran’s first true intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), allegedly capable of 12,000 km at Mach 16 while carrying a two-ton warhead. Footage released by Iranian state media showed what appeared to be a successful test launch, though independent analysts caution that the missile’s full capabilities and ICBM classification remain unconfirmed. Watch: Khorramshar-5 Missile Drones formed the other pillar of Iran’s pre-war force. The country produced 3,000–4,000 UAVs, from the low-cost Shahed-136 loitering munition ($20K–$50K per unit) to the Mohajer-6 ($100K–$500K) and long-endurance models like the Fotros and Ababil-5. Many were exported to partners and proxies, including Russia, Hezbollah, and Yemen’s Houthis.
Mohajer-6
The June conflict strained these inventories heavily. Iran launched over 550 ballistic missiles and more than 1,000 drones toward Israel and Gulf targets. Israeli defenses intercepted over 90% of the missiles, with only a few dozen striking populated areas, and neutralized nearly all drones, with fewer than 200 entering Israeli airspace and none causing significant damage. By late July, analysts estimated Iran’s operational missile count had fallen to 500–700, with multiple launch sites, command centers, and production facilities damaged. The cost of the missile campaign alone was estimated between $1.1 billion and $6.6 billion. Looking ahead, Iran faces the challenge of replenishing its arsenal under sanctions and reduced industrial capacity. Analysts expect continued investment in solid-fuel SRBMs, claimed hypersonic systems like the Fattah-2, and possibly AI-guided drone swarms. Western intelligence assessments suggest that, if pursued, a viable ICBM could emerge by around 2035 through adaptation of Iran’s space-launch technology.  

Israel: A Shield of Layers and Precision Strikes

Israel entered the war with a smaller missile inventory but one of the most sophisticated multi-layered air defense networks in the world. The Iron Dome intercepted short-range threats at about $50,000 per shot. The David’s Sling engaged medium-range missiles at $700,000 per interceptor, and the Arrow-2/3 handled long-range and exo-atmospheric threats, costing between $3–5 million per missile. This architecture had been tested in smaller conflicts but never against the scale of Iran’s June barrage.

Watch: Iranian Drones Breach Iron Dome in Tel Aviv

In addition to interceptors, Israel deployed a modern drone fleet. Systems like the Heron TP (over 30 hours endurance), Hermes 900, and loitering munitions such as the Harop and

SkyStriker provided intelligence, surveillance,

and precision strike capabilities. These drones are often integrated directly with Israel’s air force and intelligence network, enabling rapid, targeted responses.

During the war, Israel intercepted over 90% of incoming missiles and nearly 99% of drones, but sustaining this defense came at a high cost — roughly $285 million per night during peak fighting. Covert operations also played a key role: Mossad teams reportedly deployed micro-drones inside Iran months before hostilities, sabotaging launchers and radar systems. Airstrikes that followed destroyed over 120 missile launchers and struck nuclear facilities, significantly reducing Iran’s ability to continue large-scale launches.

Watch: Israel’s drone hitting the grounds of Tajrish, Tehran

F-22 Raptor

Post-war, Israel’s main challenge is replenishing interceptor stockpiles, especially Arrow-3 units, which some analysts say could be exhausted in 12 days at the war’s firing rate. The future likely holds further development of autonomous drone swarms and even experimental hypersonic UAVs projected for late this decade.

Technology, Cost, and the Next Chapter

The June 2025 conflict underscored not just the scale of each country’s arsenal, but the economic and industrial demands of modern warfare. Iran’s strength in numbers was met with Israel’s investment in layered defenses and precision tools. Both sides emerged with strategic lessons: Iran must rebuild under constraints, while Israel must sustain costly defenses without overextending resources.

As the region watches and adapts, one fact remains: missiles and drones will continue to define the military balance between these two nations. Their future developments — whether in range, speed, or autonomy — will shape not only their own security landscapes but the broader stability of the Middle East.

1. Iran’s Missile and Drone Arsenal

Name

Type / Propulsion

Range (km)

Unit Cost (USD)

Quality & Notes

Shahab-1

SRBM (liquid)

~300

Early model, now aging and largely outdated.

Shahab-2

SRBM (liquid)

~500

Improved over Shahab-1, but still limited by old liquid-fuel tech.

Qiam-1

SRBM (liquid)

600–800

~$3.5M

Improved guidance, but liquid fueling slows readiness.

Fateh-110 / 313

SRBM (solid)

300 / 500

$110K–$2.1M

Solid fuel, accurate, reliable, fast to launch.

Zolfaghar

SRBM (solid)

700–750

~$150K

Widely exported, moderate accuracy and speed.

Emad

MRBM (liquid)

~1,700+

Enhanced precision version of Shahab-3.

Ghadr-110 / Ghadr-1

MRBM (liquid)

1,800–2,000

~$5M

Improved accuracy and payload over earlier models.

Sejjil-2

MRBM (solid)

~2,000

~$6M

Two-stage solid-fuel missile, faster launch and more survivable.

Khorramshahr-4/3

MRBM (liquid)

2,000–3,000

~$8M

Large warhead, potentially multi-warhead capable.

Khorramshahr-5

Claimed ICBM (unverified)

~12,000

Rumored Mach 16 ICBM; no confirmed tests.

Kheibar Shekan

MRBM (solid)

~1,450

High precision, maneuverable re-entry, solid fuel.

Fattah-1 / Fattah-2

Hypersonic (solid)

1,400–1,500

Claimed hypersonic speed, still in development.

Soumar / Quds-1

Cruise missile (liquid)

2,000–3,000 / 700–1,300

Long-range ground-launched cruise capability.

Jihad missile

SRBM (liquid)

~1,000

Modern, low-altitude design, Mach ~8.5, harder to detect.

2. Israel’s Missile and Defense Systems

System Name

Type

Range (km)

Unit Cost (USD)

Quality & Notes

Tamir

Short-range interceptor

4–70

$40K–$80K

Fast, agile, cost-effective, 90%+ intercept rate in real combat.

David’s Sling

Medium-range interceptor

100–200+

$700K–$1M

Agile and precise against MRBMs and cruise missiles.

Arrow-2

Long-range interceptor

~200

~$3M

Intercepts inside atmosphere, high reliability.

Arrow-3

Exo-atmospheric interceptor

Higher than Arrow-2

$3M+

Destroys threats in space before re-entry.

Iron Beam

Laser defense (experimental)

Very short

Future low-cost option, currently in testing.

3. Israel’s Fighter Jets

Aircraft

Generation

Top Speed (Mach)

Range (km)

Unit Cost ($M)

Quality & Notes

F-35I Adir

5th

1.6

2,200

90

Stealth multirole fighter, Israeli-customized for EW and sensors.

F-15I Ra’am

4.5th

2.5

4,450

100

Long-range heavy strike platform, large payload, proven combat history.

F-16I Sufa

4th

2

4,200

70

Versatile multirole jet, upgraded Israeli avionics.

F-22 Raptor

5th

2.25

3,000

150

Operated in cooperation with US; unmatched air dominance.

Mirage III/2000

3rd–4th

2.2

1,550

N/A

Aging design, primarily for training and secondary roles.

      

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *